Australian Election and Voting Behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Australian Election and Voting Behaviour - Essay ExampleThis paper uses data from the 2001 Australian Election Study (AES), to investigate the level of ships company identification, political attitudes and pick out behaviour in the election in Australia.This paper finds that whereas a weakening in the strength of party identification is associated with the potential import of the development of the major1 and minor parties2. Partisan de-alignment is also changing the dynamics of the de borderinants of turnout. Since non-identifiers argon more strongly influenced by the political context than strong identifiers, and there are now more non-identifiers than previously, the political context is becoming a more important factor in determining whether people vote or not. A question of potential importance is whether to study vote in the House of Representatives or in the Senate, or even possibly party identification. In part, this is because the voting system in the Senate is more minor party-friendly because of its more proportional outcomes, but a further reason for examining Senate vote is the greater consistency in choice offered to voters (Charnock, 2004). In the House, voters in each of the electoral divisions (of which there are usually just fewer than 150) face differing choices, with (apart from the possible importance of electorate-specific issues and personalities) not all parties offering candidates in every contest. In particular, it becomes impossible to separately analyse voters for the National and Liberal parties in view of the dash in which One Nation apparently obtained very much of its support in National areas, this is an important deficiency for 1998 in particular.3 In the last two decades, Australian major political parties, like those in other(a) western democracies, have faced serious problems. These include challenges to the relevance of their traditional ideologies and institutional support bases, slipping memberships and rank and fil e participation, declining party identification, an erosion of trust in majoritarian party government and the rise of new parties and social movements (Marsh 1995 Smith 1998).Party Identification Party identification is a political term to tell apart a voters underlying allegiance to a political party. The term was first used in the world politics in the 1950s, but use of the term has decreased in usage as the process of party dealignment has accelerated. Party identification is a pychological attachment toward a political party that tends to influence a persons decisions on social, economic and political issues. Some researchers view party identification as a form of social identity (Hershey, 101), in the same way that a person identifies with a religious or ethnic group. This identity develops early in a persons life mainly through family and social influences. This description would make party identification a stable perspective, which develops as a consequence of personal, f amily, social and environmental factors. Other researchers consider party identification to be more flexible and more of a conscious choice. They see it as a position and a choice based on the continued estimation of the political, economic and social environment. A person who identifies with a particular political party is called a partisan. The partisan accepts the standard beliefs